arnage Posted April 20, 2015 Author Report Share Posted April 20, 2015 Na XP nije nikakva, a na W7 sa smanjenjem buffera se smanjuje i taj neki boom efekat. Meni je to objaÅ¡njeno kao jedna od razlika audio pipe ta dva OS, gde W7 za potrebe skladiÅ¡tenja podataka taj neki transportni signal konvertuje u neki drugi i skladiÅ¡ti, pa onda kada mu doÄ‘e vreme izvrÅ¡enja opet konvertuje i Å¡alje dalje. Kod XP su uvek svi podaci u audio pipe-u Å¡to se, navodno, pod nekim okolnostima pokazalo kao nestabilno. Pod kojim, Å¡ta, kako, nemam pojma. A 256 samples latency na zvuÄnoj je (valjda) približno 11ms obrade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garson Posted April 20, 2015 Report Share Posted April 20, 2015 Jos jedno pitanje, sad se setih. Zasto ne Win7 umesto XPa ako je problem do drajvera za XP? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arnage Posted April 20, 2015 Author Report Share Posted April 20, 2015 Napisah u postu pre, i jeste sada Win7 x64. S tim Å¡to mi je preporuÄen Win8 pa ću eventualno probati i taj. Polako. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arnage Posted April 20, 2015 Author Report Share Posted April 20, 2015 ... na W7 sa smanjenjem buffera se smanjuje i taj neki boom efekat. ... Kada se podešava buffer, klikne se Stop ako ide pesma, podesi neka vrednost buffera, Apply, Ok, ugasi se i ponovo pokrene Foobar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarKi Posted July 2, 2015 Report Share Posted July 2, 2015 You are correct in regards to the win audio driver. Using application prevents it from picking up other sounds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arnage Posted July 3, 2015 Author Report Share Posted July 3, 2015 Pardon? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.